ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025
A composite universal DNA signature for the tree of life.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant species identification by genome skimming across the vascular plant tree of life.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Article
- DNA-based identification of plants and the genomic nature of plant species differences.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Advancing biological taxonomy in the AI era: deep learning applications, challenges, and future directions.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Identification of mathematical patterns in genomic spectrograms linked to variant classification in complete SARS-CoV-2 sequences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unlocking natural history collections to improve eDNA reference databases and biodiversity monitoring.Bioscience · 2025Article
- A composite universal DNA signature for the tree of life.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Positional frequency chaos game representation for machine learning-based classification of crop lncRNAs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A curated benchmark dataset for molecular identification based on genome skimming.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species identification using DNA barcodes has revolutionized biodiversity sciences. However, conventional barcoding methods may lack power and universal applicability across the tree of life. Alternative methods based on whole genome sequencing are hard to scale due to large data requirements. Here we develop a novel DNA-based identification method, varKoding, using exceptionally low-coverage genome skim data to create two-dimensional images representing the genomic signature of a species. Using these representations, we train neural networks for taxonomic identification. Applying a taxonomically verified novel genomic dataset of Malpighiales plant accessions, we optimize training hyperparameters and find the highest performance by combining a transformer architecture with a new modified chaos game representation. Greater than 91% precision is achieved despite minimal input data, exceeding alternative methods tested. We illustrate the broad utility of varKoding across several focal clades of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. We also train a model capable of identifying all species in the Sequence Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information using less than 10 Mbp sequencing data with 96% precision and 95% recall and robust to sequencing platforms. The varKoding approach offers enhanced computational efficiency and scalability, minimal data inputs robust to sequencing details and modularity for further development in biodiversity science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.