Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562809›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025

The utility of next generation sequencing targeted multigene panels in the Adult Neurogenetic Clinic at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.

Cumine Van Tonder, Mardelle Schoeman, Jonathan Carr, Franclo Henning, Claude Bailly, Shahida Moosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What's new in EJHG this autumn.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cumine Van TonderDivision of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mardelle SchoemanDivision of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jonathan CarrDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7677-426X
Franclo HenningDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Claude BaillyDivision of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Shahida MoosaDivision of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. shahidamoosa@sun.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-4463-3067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) based tests have become first-line investigative modalities in adult neurogenetic clinics. Studies in high-income countries (HICs) show that NGS is cost-effective and reliable in diagnosing adult neurogenetic disorders (NGDs). African populations harbour vast genomic diversity, but there is limited knowledge on the molecular basis of NGDs affecting these populations due to lack of access to the necessary technology. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to describe the clinical utility of NGS panels in an African low-middle income country (LMIC). It included data of 74 adult participants seen at the multidisciplinary neurogenetic clinic at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, over a 4 - year period. Forty-three symptomatic index cases underwent NGS panel testing, while 31 relatives received targeted familial variant testing based on specific indications relevant to each case. Twenty-two different disease group-specific NGS panels were requested, spanning the NGD phenotypic spectrum. The diagnostic yield (DY) in index cases was 39.5% (17/43). Four relatives were clinically affected, and all tested positive for the familial-specific variant. This study demonstrated the DY achieved with NGS testing in an LMIC adult neurogenetic cohort, was comparable to DYs previously reported in HICs. These results argue for the use of NGS panels as first-tier testing in resource constrained LMICs, to limit lengthy diagnostic odysseys and unnecessary investigations. A definitive molecular diagnosis enables evidence-based management, surveillance, genetic counselling, and familial variant screening for relatives. Lastly, it assists with enrolment into clinical trials focussed on the development of precision medicine.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNervous System DiseasesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40562809
PMCPMC12402217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.