ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
The utility of next generation sequencing targeted multigene panels in the Adult Neurogenetic Clinic at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for Improved Clinical Outcomes in People Living With Rare Diseases in Global South: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- What's new in EJHG this autumn.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) based tests have become first-line investigative modalities in adult neurogenetic clinics. Studies in high-income countries (HICs) show that NGS is cost-effective and reliable in diagnosing adult neurogenetic disorders (NGDs). African populations harbour vast genomic diversity, but there is limited knowledge on the molecular basis of NGDs affecting these populations due to lack of access to the necessary technology. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to describe the clinical utility of NGS panels in an African low-middle income country (LMIC). It included data of 74 adult participants seen at the multidisciplinary neurogenetic clinic at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, over a 4 - year period. Forty-three symptomatic index cases underwent NGS panel testing, while 31 relatives received targeted familial variant testing based on specific indications relevant to each case. Twenty-two different disease group-specific NGS panels were requested, spanning the NGD phenotypic spectrum. The diagnostic yield (DY) in index cases was 39.5% (17/43). Four relatives were clinically affected, and all tested positive for the familial-specific variant. This study demonstrated the DY achieved with NGS testing in an LMIC adult neurogenetic cohort, was comparable to DYs previously reported in HICs. These results argue for the use of NGS panels as first-tier testing in resource constrained LMICs, to limit lengthy diagnostic odysseys and unnecessary investigations. A definitive molecular diagnosis enables evidence-based management, surveillance, genetic counselling, and familial variant screening for relatives. Lastly, it assists with enrolment into clinical trials focussed on the development of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.