Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562713›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2025

Assessing Readiness of International Investigations into Alleged Biological Weapons Use.

Maximilian Brackmann, Anja Blasse, Júlio Gouveia Carvalho, Cindi R Corbett, Cédric Invernizzi, Una Jakob, Stefan Kloth, Filippa Lentzos, Ines Mergler, Per Wikström

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maximilian Brackmann
Anja Blasse
Júlio Gouveia Carvalho
Cindi R Corbett
Cédric Invernizzi
Una Jakob
Stefan Kloth
Filippa Lentzos
Ines Mergler
Per Wikström

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Without clarity if an outbreak is natural, accidental, or deliberate, infectious disease outbreaks of unknown or ambiguous origin can lead to speculation of a purposeful biological attack. Outbreaks in conflict settings are particularly prone to suspicions and allegations. In an increasingly confrontative global geopolitical landscape and with active information manipulation, outbreaks of ambiguous origin are likely to increase concerns of the deliberate use of biological agents. The United Nations General Assembly has agreed on and the United Nations Security Council has endorsed a mechanism to investigate allegations of deliberate use titled the United Nations Secretary-General's Mechanism for Investigation of Alleged Use of Chemical or Biological Weapons. A recent full-scale field exercise evaluated the deployment readiness of the mechanism and found it is well placed to investigate suspicious disease outbreaks, with room for continual improvement.

Indexed as

Biological WarfareBiological Warfare AgentsBioterrorismDisease OutbreaksHumansUnited NationsBiological Warfare Agentsbiological weaponsbioterrorism and preparednessOutbreak investigationpublic healthsecretary-generalunited nationsUNSGM

Identifiers

PMID40562713
PMCPMC12205372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.