ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025
The importance of structural elements in narrative persuasion: Using the narrative immersion model to promote melanoma prevention.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The importance of structural elements in narrative persuasion: Using the narrative immersion model to promote melanoma prevention.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Narrative health and risk messaging is most effective when audiences become immersed in the story. The narrative immersion model (NIM) suggests that certain structural elements can increase narrative immersion. Notably, these structural elements are often found in naturally occurring diagnostic narratives (i.e., stories focused on diagnoses). Across two studies, the current research tested four NIM-supported structural elements in the melanoma context. Study 1 (N = 455) tested the effects of point of view, inclusion of a prologue, and explicit time orientation in a melanoma survivor narrative. Sunscreen intention was highest for a first-person story with a prologue, followed by a third-person story without a prologue. Study 2 (N = 592) added nuance by comparing the effects of point of view and prologue for a survivor versus a death outcome. The finding from Study 1 was replicated for the survivor outcome, but the opposite pattern-third-person with a prologue and first-person without a prologue-produced the greatest sunscreen intention with a death outcome. Identification was the mechanism of effect for Study 1; believability was the mechanism of effect for Study 2. Findings contribute greater nuance to research and theorizing about first-person voice, demonstrating that effectiveness is dependent on other story elements. Practically, the current research also highlights the importance of carefully considering how narrative health and risk messaging is constructed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.