Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562693›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Analysis of parental beliefs and practices leading to excessive screen time in early childhood.

Priyank Bhutani, Litna A Varghese, Gagan Bajaj, Charul Bhutani, Firoz Khan, Geetha R Menon, Ramesh Chandra Deka, Suvendra Kumar Ray, Siddhartha Sankar Satapathy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priyank BhutaniCenter for Multidisciplinary Research, Tezpur University, Napaam, Assam, India.
Litna A VargheseDepartment of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9585-1656
Gagan BajajDepartment of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India gagan.bajaj@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7551-7889
Charul BhutaniBhutani Speech and Hearing clinic, New Delhi, India.
Firoz KhanNational Institute for Research in Digital Health and Data Sciences, ICMR, New Delhi, India.
Geetha R MenonDepartment of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), New Delhi, India.
Ramesh Chandra DekaDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tezpur University, Napaam, Assam, India.
Suvendra Kumar RayDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tezpur University, Napaam, Assam, India.
Siddhartha Sankar SatapathyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Tezpur University, Napaam, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive screen time in young children is a growing concern in the digital age. It is important to explore parental beliefs and practices that could shape children's screen time routines.

methodsThis cross-sectional study surveyed 3624 parents of children aged 2-5 years from five northern Indian states between July and October 2024. The participants completed a validated questionnaire assessing sociodemographic factors, children's screen time duration, parental beliefs and practices related to screen time regulation (guidelines and enforcement), screen use purposes (eg, feeding, chores) and perceived impacts on child development (eg, social skills, attention, speech/language). Data analysis included χ

resultsOver 60% of the children spent 2-4 hours daily on screens, with no significant associations between weekday-weekend screen time patterns and sociodemographic factors. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that the odds of excessive screen use were greater among children whose parents were unsure of whether restrictions should be set (AOR=3.03 for 4-6 hours), those whose parents did not set screen time limits (AOR=1.64 for 4-6 hours and AOR=2.07 for >8 hours), those whose parents used screens during feeding (AOR=1.82 for 2-4 hours; AOR=2.66 for 4-6 hours, AOR=2.79 for 4-8 hours and 3.54 for >8 hours) and those whose parents did not believe that screen time hindered speech and language development (AOR=1.77 for 2-4 hours and AOR=2.11 for 4-6 hours).

conclusionParental factors, including the absence of screen time limits and the cultural use of screens during mealtimes, contribute to excessive screen time. Interventions in India should focus on practical programmes that support parents in managing screen time, tailored to regional and cultural contexts.

Indexed as

ParentingParentsScreen TimeAdultChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndiaMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesChildGrowth & DevelopmentIndiaParentsScreen time

Identifiers

PMID40562693
PMCPMC12198805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.