ArticleBMJ open2025
What do Australian university staff perceive are the features of high-quality rural health student placements? A sequential explanatory study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore the features of high-quality rural health student placements from the perspective of university staff involved in designing, delivering and evaluating these programmes.
designA sequential explanatory mixed methods design was employed, integrating quantitative survey data with qualitative interview findings to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research question. SETTING AND
participantsThe study was conducted online and sampled staff from universities across Australia, focusing on rural health student placements. The study involved 121 university staff members who participated in the survey, with 10 of these participants also taking part in follow-up qualitative interviews.
methodsQuantitative data were collected using an online survey distributed to university staff involved in designing, delivering and evaluating rural health student placements. The survey included Likert scale, open-ended and demographic questions, and a preliminary analysis was used to write the interview questions. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. The quantitative and qualitative results were integrated to produce a narrative summary of findings.
resultsKey features identified as essential for high-quality rural health placements included safe and affordable accommodation, financial support and personal safety. High-quality supervision, cultural awareness training and opportunities for interprofessional education were also highlighted. The qualitative findings provided depth to the quantitative data, emphasising the importance of structuring learning within a continuum of education and fostering connections through co-location and community engagement.
conclusionsThis study identifies fundamental features of high-quality rural health placements in Australia, including accommodation, student safety, supervision and cultural responsiveness training. These findings can inform the design, delivery and evaluation of rural health student placements, contributing to the quality of these programmes as an efficacious learning experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.