ArticleBMJ open2025
Performance-based payments and intrinsic motivation among primary healthcare workers in China: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and operational features of medical alliances in China.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Workplace management practices and quiet quitting among primary healthcare workers: a sequential-parallel mediation analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Extended working hours, income, and multidimensional wellbeing among physicians in China: a cross-sectional mediation analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to examine whether pay-for-performance (performance-based payment (PBP)) may crowd out intrinsic motivation by analysing the association between the proportions of the PBP component of the total salary and intrinsic motivation levels among primary healthcare workers in China.
designA cross-sectional survey. The primary outcome was intrinsic motivation, measured using the intrinsic motivation subscale of the 15-item work motivation scale. SETTING AND
participantsThe study involved 1927 primary healthcare workers from 31 institutions in Weifang city, Shandong province, China.
interventionsThe proportion of PBP was the primary intervention variable. Additionally, subanalysis was conducted across different performance dimensions, including whom to incentivise and the domain of performance measured.
resultsThe results revealed a complex relationship between the proportion of the PBP component of the total salary and intrinsic motivation levels among primary healthcare workers. Overall, higher PBP proportions were associated with increased intrinsic motivation scores (β=0.49, p<0.05), particularly when incentives targeted groups rather than individuals (β=1.04, p<0.05) and when both the quantity and quality of care were included in performance measurement (β=0.61, p<0.05). However, when performance was measured solely based on the number of healthcare visits, a significant negative impact on intrinsic motivation was observed (β=-1.19, p<0.05).
conclusionThis study underscored the importance of designing PBP schemes to enhance performance without undermining intrinsic motivation among primary healthcare workers. PBP schemes should not only focus on increasing financial incentives but also incorporate incentive methods that acknowledge healthcare workers' professional contributions and expertise. These findings were crucial for policymakers and healthcare administrators aiming to optimise PBP schemes to enhance performance and ensure the sustainability of the effectiveness of these schemes by preserving intrinsic motivation among China's primary healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.