Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562437›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025

The impact of smoking on lung cancer patients.

Fabrizio Minervini, Savvas Lampridis, Peter Kestenholz, Esther Pardo, Julie Crommelinck, Paul Martin Putora, Marlène Schnider, Matteo Petroncini, Nora Mayer, Pietro Bertoglio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Vaping-related lung disease: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Assessment of Quality of Life in the Early Postoperative Period in Patients with Lung Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabrizio MinerviniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland fabriziominervini@hotmail.com.
Savvas LampridisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2827-5826
Peter KestenholzDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Esther PardoDivision of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Julie CrommelinckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Paul Martin PutoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Marlène SchniderDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Matteo PetronciniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Bologna, Italy.
Nora MayerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Pietro BertoglioDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although smoking prevalence has shown a decreasing trend, the total number of smokers remains high due to population growth. Smoking causes several diseases, including lung cancer, COPD, coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease. Most of the adverse effects of smoking are reversible and smoking cessation treatments are a cost-effective and high-impact intervention for reducing the risk of mortality and morbidity from smoking-related illness. Smoking cessation may have a significant impact in patients diagnosed with lung cancer, as continued tobacco use can critically compromise treatment efficacy, increase the risk of recurrence and reduce overall survival. Moreover, the benefits of smoking cessation in lung cancer patients can also improve quality of life. The tremendous health and economic consequences of the smoking epidemic should make tobacco control a top priority for governments worldwide. This review aims to highlight the necessity of incorporating smoking cessation as a standard component of lung cancer treatment protocols to enhance patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. At the same time, we identified a lack of current evidence regarding the optimal timing of smoking cessation among lung cancer patients, which provides the basis for further investigation.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmokingSmoking CessationHumansPrevalenceQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40562437
PMCPMC12220743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.