SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2025
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for clavicle fractures in emergency settings: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveUltrasound provides real-time, high-resolution imaging and is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool for clavicle fractures. Compared with traditional imaging modalities, ultrasound offers advantages such as point-of-care accessibility, absence of radiation exposure, and rapid diagnosis capability, making it particularly useful in emergency settings. However, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound across different clinical studies remains inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for clavicle fractures through a meta-analysis of existing studies.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed until 25 February 2025. Studies reporting the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic performance of ultrasound for clavicle fractures were included. Data extraction and statistical analysis were performed using Stata version 18.0.ResultsA meta-analysis of seven eligible studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval: 87%-95%) and pooled specificity of 95% (95% confidence interval: 91%-98%), indicating relatively high diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity showed low-to-moderate heterogeneity, whereas specificity demonstrated significant heterogeneity. Fagan plot and likelihood ratio analysis supported the clinical utility of ultrasound for both confirming and excluding clavicle fractures. The likelihood ratio scattergram indicated that ultrasound shows good performance in ruling in clavicle fractures but only moderately good performance in ruling them out.ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that ultrasound is a promising, noninvasive diagnostic modality for clavicle fractures, especially in emergency settings. Its diagnostic accuracy, coupled with its safety profile, makes it a potentially valuable tool. Nevertheless, standardization of scanning protocols and further validation in diverse populations are needed. Future studies are warranted to standardize scanning protocols, evaluate operator-dependent factors, and validate findings across broader clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.