Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562025›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025

"Being alone is no fun"- experiences with loneliness by older people: a qualitative study.

Katja Goetz, Johanna Bergsträsser, Teresa Schmahl, Jost Steinhäuser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katja GoetzInstitute of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4034-3254
Johanna BergsträsserInstitute of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Teresa SchmahlInstitute of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Jost SteinhäuserInstitute of Family Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLoneliness is increasingly prevalent in all age groups and has become a public health problem for older people. Moreover, loneliness can have a negative impact on psychological and physical well-being. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate older adults' experiences of loneliness and explore their barriers and strategies to overcome their loneliness.

methodsA purposive sample of older adults (aged ≥60 years) participated in a semi-structured interview. The interviews were conducted between May and July 2024. The interviews were analysed using a qualitative content approach.

resultsOverall, 27 older people were interviewed in this study. Loneliness was perceived as a temporary or permanent condition and was influenced by biographical context, health, and retirement pay status. Individual coping strategies and external support services were found to help avoid loneliness. Barriers were intra-individual factors such as shame and anxiety, their own health-related situation, and the public transportation situation.

conclusionsMoney aspects, successful digital integration, and mobility-limiting diseases might be barriers that need to be considered when strategies against loneliness are developed. Moreover, it would be helpful to announce, use, and develop local structures at the community level to bring people together especially for people who are difficult to reach or feel stigmatized.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalLonelinessAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyFemaleHealth StatusHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchShameSocial SupportExperiencesinterviewlonelinessolder peoplequalitative researchsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID40562025
PMCPMC12897532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.