Trial reportThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Real-time Ultrasound-guided Lumbar Puncture: A Comparison of Two Techniques Using Simulation.
Trial report in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe current literature on the use of real-time ultrasound-guidance for lumbar punctures (LP) is limited. Two techniques have been described: the paramedian sagittal oblique (PSO); and the transverse interlaminar (TL) approach. Our objectives in this study were to compare the procedure outcomes between these two techniques and assess the ability of emergency physicians to perform ultrasound-guided LPs.
methodsThis was a prospective study whose participants included emergency physicians. Participants were randomized into either Group P (PSO technique) or Group T (TL technique). After a didactic session, participants then performed an ultrasound-guided LP on a training manikin, during which we collected procedure data. A survey was administered after completion of the procedure.
resultsA total of 31 participants were included, 16 in Group P and 15 in Group T. Most participants (90.3%) successfully performed the procedure, without a statistical difference between Group P and Group T (15/16 vs 13/15, P = 0.95). Group T required a longer average time to complete the procedure (176.7 ± 140.4 seconds [s] vs 311.2 ± 202.3 s, P = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference between Group P and Group T with regard to average time needed to obtain the required ultrasound view (18.3 ± 14.6 s vs 35.1 ± 32.9 s, P = 0.09); number of needle redirections; total number of needle passes; first puncture success; number of participants who advanced the needle without visualization of the tip (13/16 vs 14/15, P = 0.64); penetration of the anterior dura; and needle contact with bone. The Likert-style questionnaire responses (reported on a 1-10 scale) revealed no difference between Group P and Group T as to perceived difficulty of finding the required ultrasound view (3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-5) vs 5 (IQR 3-6.5), P = 0.10), perceived difficulty of needle tracking, or rating of the needle view when entering the intrathecal space. However, Group T reported a higher overall perceived level of difficulty (4 [IQR 3-5] vs 6 (IQR 5.5-7.5), P= 0.01).
conclusionThis study suggests emergency physicians can be trained to use ultrasound-guidance for lumbar puncture in the simulation setting without significantly prohibitive training. Both techniques were performed with high success rates. There may be a preference for implementing the paramedian sagittal oblique approach over the transverse interlaminar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.