Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561992›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025

Evaluation of Disparities in Emergency Department Admission and Wait Times for Non-English Preferred Patients.

John Wong-Castillo, Daniel Berger, Juan Carlos Montoy, Riham Alwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gaps in Documenting Interpreter Service Utilization Among Emergency Department Clinicians Treating Patients With Limited English Proficiency.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John Wong-CastilloUniversity of California San Francisco - Fresno, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fresno, California.
Daniel BergerVirginia Commonwealth University Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Juan Carlos MontoyUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Riham AlwanUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients who prefer to communicate in a language other than English are vulnerable to the consequences of medical communication barriers. Studies of non-English language preferred (NELP) and English language preferred (ELP) patients have shown differences in rates of hospital admission and wait times-factors known to be related to increased costs and lower patient satisfaction. However, few studies include languages other than Spanish or account for patient acuity level.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study at an urban, Level I trauma center from January-December 2020. Patients were grouped by language preference, with NELP languages grouped into three categories: Spanish; Chinese (Mandarin, Cantonese, Taishanese, Taiwanese, and Zhongshan-Chinese dialect); and other (all other remaining languages). We extracted age, sex, race, ethnicity, language preference, emergency department (ED) discharge disposition, and Emergency Severity Index Score (ESI) from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the hospital admission rate. Secondary outcomes were the time from patient arrival to placement in the treatment room and the time from patient arrival to disposition. We analyzed data with chi-square tests, logistic, and linear regressions.

resultsOf the 58,079 unique ED encounters, 26.4% (15,307) patients identified as NELP. Within NELP patient encounters, 75.0% preferred Spanish, 13.9% preferred Chinese, and 11.1% preferred another language. After adjusting for age and acuity, Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients were at 16% and 14% higher odds of admission, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.23 and OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.27 respectively), compared to ELP patients. NELP patients waited an average 5.4 minutes longer to be roomed (95% CI 4.46-6.29) and 15.6 minutes longer until disposition (95% CI 12.62-18.54, P<0.05). This discrepancy was greater for patients triaged at lower acuities, with ESI 5 Spanish language- and Chinese language-preferred patients waiting an average of 50.3 and 90.6 minutes longer than ELP patients until disposition (95% CI 17.67-83.57; and 95% CI 24.31-81.57 respectively).

conclusionAfter adjusting for acuity level and age, non-English language preferred patients were at higher odds of admission and experienced disparate wait times, especially at lower acuity levels. Further investigation is needed to understand the causes of these differences and mitigate these health inequities.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersEmergency Service, HospitalHealthcare DisparitiesLanguagePatient AdmissionPatient PreferenceWaiting ListsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID40561992
PMCPMC12208044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.