ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Emergency Medical Service Responders' Perspectives on Transgender, Intersexual, and Non-Binary Patients in Germany.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGender minorities, including transgender, intersexual and non-binary (TIN) individuals, are at risk of receiving suboptimal care in emergency departments due to clinicians' limited knowledge and formal training in TIN-specific needs. Little evidence is available regarding emergency medical service (EMS) responders, including paramedics (EMT-P), emergency medical technicians (EMT) ,and prehospital emergency physicians (EP). Therefore, in this study we aimed to explore the experiences and knowledge, attitudes, and education/training needs of EMS professionals in Germany regarding the care of TIN patients.
methodsIn April 2023, we electronically surveyed EMTs, EMT-Ps and prehospital EPs from ambulance stations across Germany. Participants completed a questionnaire consisting of 15 closed-ended items assessing their experience and knowledge, attitudes, and education/training needs regarding the care of TIN patients. We used standard descriptive statistics and tested for group differences using the chi-square test.
resultsOf the 2,925 potential respondents, 906 completed the survey and were eligible for further analysis (response rate: 31%). Of these, 218 (24%) were prehospital EPs and 688 (76%) were EMTs and EMT-Ps, the latter two being significantly younger and less experienced. Almost half of the respondents reported having experience in caring for TIN patients as EMS responders (45% of EMTs/EMT-Ps vs 40% of prehospital EPs) but demonstrated significant gaps in non-medical and medical knowledge. Attitudes toward TIN patients were generally positive, but there were discrepancies between perceived comfort and actual communication behavior, with up to 25% of respondents overall avoiding questions they would ask non-TIN patients. Most respondents had no formal training in the appropriate management of TIN patients: only 7% of EMTs/EMT-Ps and 5% of prehospital EPs indicated having received such training during their professional or medical training. Our survey showed that 63% of EMTs/EMT-Ps and 62% of prehospital EPs agreed that there is an urgent need to increase awareness for TIN patients among EMS responders.
conclusionDespite generally positive attitudes toward transexual, intersexual and non-binary patients, EMS responders in Germany demonstrated deficits in knowledge and clinical preparedness to care for this vulnerable patient population, indicating that the care of TIN patients has not yet become routine in EMS and highlighting a strong need for improved education and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.