ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Trends in Studies on Transesophageal Echocardiography in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been introduced in resuscitative scenarios in recent decades, with a growing number of emergency physicians learning, performing, and studying resuscitative TEE.
objectiveOur goal was to characterize publishing trends regarding TEE use in emergency medicine (EM) and to investigate the increasing interest in potential applications of TEE in emergency departments (ED).
methodsWe retrieved published research associated with the use of TEE in EM from the Web of Science database from inception to December 31, 2023. We analyzed trends based on the number of articles published annually. To systematically map trends related to TEE in emergency medicine (EM), we extracted data on the number of unique EM TEE practitioners, institutions performing EM TEE, study topics, and other characteristics from research articles and case reports. To better reflect research trends, we exclusively conducted subgroup analysis on the research articles. We used linear regression analysis to analyze trends and conducted checkpoints on the timelines.
resultsOf the 964 titles and abstracts screened, we included 99 eligible published articles after careful review. Articles related to EM TEE increased from one article in 1991 to 20 articles in 2023, and the rate of publication has increased rapidly since 2018 (+12.4 publications per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.8-15.0, P<0.001). The number of EM TEE practitioners and EM TEE-performing institutions underwent a rapid expansion with an inflection point between 2018-2020, with a rate of +91.7 practitioners per year and +36.5 institutions per year. Subgroup analysis revealed a similar trend in the published research articles. The most common indications for EM TEE were cardiac arrest (72.7%), shock (13.1%), and procedural guidance (11.1%). The United States published the majority of EM TEE-related articles (51.5%).
conclusionThe present study highlights that TEE-related articles in EM continue to accelerate. Among the indications for TEE, cardiac arrest remains the most frequently discussed. This scoping review provides insights into the expanding interest and applications of TEE in the field of EM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.