Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561827›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Assessment of process hygiene criteria in poultry slaughterhouses: A comparative analysis of own-checks and official controls in Northeast Italy (2021-2023).

Alfonso Rosamilia, Giorgio Galletti, Gabriele Casadei, Giovanni Dell'Orfano, Margherita Ferrari, Elisa Di Carlantonio, Francesca Vergani, Nicola Riceputi, Francesco Zanchini, Lia Bardasi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The poultry chain in Sardinia (Italy): monitoring ofItalian journal of food safety · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Risk Factors and Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alfonso RosamiliaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy. Electronic address: alfonso.rosamilia@izsler.it.
Giorgio GallettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Gabriele CasadeiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Giovanni Dell'OrfanoLocal Health Unit Authority of Ferrara, Via Cassoli 30, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Margherita FerrariLocal Health Unit Authority of Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Elisa Di CarlantonioLocal Health Unit Authority of Modena, Via S. Giovanni del Cantone 23, 41121 Modena, Italy.
Francesca VerganiLocal Health Unit Authority of Piacenza, Piazzale Milano 3, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Nicola RiceputiLocal Health Unit Authority of Romagna, Via De Gasperi 8, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.
Francesco ZanchiniLocal Health Unit Authority of Romagna, Via De Gasperi 8, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.
Lia BardasiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Laura FiorentiniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Chiara ChiapponiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Michele DottoriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Anna PadovaniRegione Emilia-Romagna, Settore Prevenzione Collettiva and Sanità Pubblica, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Marcello TrevisaniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process hygiene criteria (PHC) for Campylobacter and Salmonella provide essential guidance on hygiene standards for poultry processing at slaughterhouses. Data collected by Member States (MSs) in Europe revealed inconsistencies between official verification and internal monitoring results, highlighting the need for a comprehensive investigation to uncover the reasons behind these discrepancies. This study investigated PHC in relation to operational factors at nine poultry slaughterhouses, integrating production characteristics and epidemiological surveillance data from a representative sample of supplying farms. The analysis is based on microbiological testing results collected between 2021 and 2023. PHC were monitored at regular intervals, creating a "moving window" of data to assess hygienic performance over time. The findings indicated that samples tested by competent authorities (CAs) showed higher prevalence rates of Campylobacter (27.6 %) and Salmonella (30.7 %) compared to those tested by food business operators (FBOs) (13.0 % and 8.7 %, respectively). However, statistically significant differences between paired observations (P < 0.05) were detected only in four high-throughput slaughterhouses. Six of the nine slaughterhouses face challenges in meeting the hygiene standards established by EC Regulation 2073/2005, with recurring non-compliance over three years, representing 17.0 % to 82.0 % of their total operational time. Serotyping of Salmonella isolates identified a high prevalence of S. Infantis (61.7 %), also prevalent in farm samples (72.0 %), frequently linked to human cases related to poultry meat in the region, underscoring its public health importance. The study highlights the importance of robust sampling protocols for comparative assessments by FBOs and CAs, alongside the need for continuous improvement in hygiene management. Discrepancies between FBO and CA sampling results, as reported by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), in this study are largely attributed to the lower sampling frequency employed by CAs, which likely captures only a fraction of the microbial variability. Recurrent breaches of PHC underscore the ineffectiveness of current interventions in controlling microbial loads. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive control measures throughout the production chain, including surveillance of emerging serovars and antimicrobial resistance monitoring.

Indexed as

AbattoirsChickensHygienePoultry DiseasesAnimalsCampylobacterItalyPrevalenceSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalCampylobacterMoving windowPoultryProcess hygiene criteriaSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID40561827
PMCPMC12241976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.