ArticlePsychiatry research. Neuroimaging2025
Causal Discovery Analysis Reveals Insights into Psychosis Proneness, Brain Function, and Environmental Factors among Young Individuals.
Article in Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severity matters: Using network analysis to explain low and high levels of persecutory beliefs.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Causal discovery methods in psychological research: Foundations, algorithms, and a practical tutorial in R.Behavior research methods · 2026Review
- Multimodal prediction of psychotic-like experiences using elastic net modeling: external validation in a clinical sample.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experiencing mild symptoms of psychosis, like delusions and hallucinations, occurs sometimes in general, nonclinical populations, often termed psychosis proneness (PP), potentially part of the psychosis continuum. Understanding the neural and environmental factors contributing to PP in young individuals during critical developmental periods remains unclear. We aimed to explore these directional relationships using causal discovery analysis (CDA). Participants were 194 healthy adolescent and young adult twin and sibling pairs aged between 14-24 years. They completed comprehensive assessments evaluating sociodemographic status, environmental risk, general intelligence, self-schema, psychosis proneness score (PPS), and working memory (WM) performance during fMRI (37 variables). CDA, a novel machine learning algorithm, was applied to understand the causal relationships of PPS. The analysis identified negative self-schema as having the largest potential causal effect among all assessments in PPS. Secondly, experiencing low levels of social cohesion and trust had a potential causal effect on PPS. Although our analysis could not exclude the possibility that other unmeasured factors may confound these relationships, the effect sizes (ES) were substantial, negative self-schema & PPS (ES= 0.54) and social cohesion and trust & PPS (ES= -0.18). PPS, on the other hand, was identified as a direct cause of greater activation in DLPFC (ES= 0.12). CDA provided simultaneous directionality for 37 variables collected on the same individuals. The findings highlight the significance of negative self-schema and social cohesion and trust in the general population with PP, emphasizing the potential for preventive interventions targeting these factors. These findings also suggest a role for DLPFC as a potential target in this regard. This study represents the first data-driven analysis to model causal mechanisms in PP in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.