ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025
Exploring Service Users' Experiences of a Community-Based Intervention to Improve Follow-Up at Bharatpur Eye Hospital in Nepal: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Follow-up to eye care services for children, especially in the context of Nepal, is essential for ensuring a continuum of care. Hence, as a continued effort, we designed this study to explore the service users' experience of a community-based intervention to improve follow-up at Bharatpur Eye Hospital (BEH) in Nepal. Objective: This study aimed to explore service users' experiences and perceptions of the community-based follow-up intervention for eye care services implemented by BEH in Nepal. Methods: A qualitative study using an in-depth interview approach was used. Participants were purposively selected for this research study. Participants who were part of a quasi-experimental study conducted to improve follow-up services in BEH and their service catchment area were chosen. Participants who had not attended even a single follow-up visit and participants who attended at least one follow-up were recruited for this qualitative study. Based on the distance from the base hospital and the follow-up status, 65 participants were initially found eligible for the qualitative study. However, only 17 participants were available and consented. Topic guides were developed for the purpose of in-depth interviews specifically for participants who had not attended even the first follow-up visits and those who attended at least one follow-up visit. A total of 2 ophthalmic assistants, who were not a part of the main intervention study, conducted the interviews. Results: In total, 17 service users whose children were receiving services from BEH participated in the qualitative study. We identified 4 key themes that provided invaluable information about the barriers and facilitators to follow-up as well as the experiences (positive or negative) of the participants that need to be considered in any future initiatives to improve follow-up in Nepal. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for systematic development of interventions to address the unmet need for eye care services in the community through innovative, scalable solutions. As a next step, the BEH team will be working to develop such scalable solutions for Nepal. Such interventions will also need to be optimized for similar settings and countries to meet the goals of universal health coverage, vision 2030, and sustainable development goals worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.