ArticleAsian/Pacific Island nursing journal2025
Exploring Clinical Decision-Making Competencies of Emergency Nurses in Trauma Care in Indonesia: Qualitative Study.
Article in Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical decision-making is vital for emergency nurses, especially in trauma care that requires swift, accurate actions. In Indonesia, where resources are limited, little is known about how nurses manage such challenges. Objective: This study aimed to explore the clinical decision-making competencies of emergency nurses in trauma care, focusing on challenges, strategies, and influencing factors. Methods: This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 16 emergency nurses, complemented by observations and document analyses. Data were analyzed thematically, with triangulation, thereby ensuring validity. Results: Six key themes emerged: (1) recognize cues; (2) analyze cues; (3) prioritize hypothesis; (4) generate solutions; (5) take actions; and (6) evaluate outcomes. These highlight the adaptive and multidimensional nature of decision-making in emergencies. Conclusions: The decision-making of emergency nurses integrates analysis, prioritization, collaboration, and reflection. Enhanced training, such as simulation-based learning, and addressing systemic barriers can improve competencies. Policymakers should provide adequate resources and robust standards to support nurses under pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.