Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561472›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Suicide Risk Screening in Jails: Protocol for a Pilot Study Leveraging the Mental Health Research Network Algorithm and Health Care Data.

Erin B Comartin, Grant Victor, Athena Kheibari, Brian K Ahmedani, Bethany Hedden-Clayton, Richard N Jones, Ted R Miller, Jennifer E Johnson, Lauren M Weinstock, Sheryl Kubiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erin B ComartinSchool of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4132-7670
Grant VictorSchool of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1654-5294
Athena KheibariSchool of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1084-0738
Brian K AhmedaniCenter for Health Policy & Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4291-4516
Bethany Hedden-ClaytonCenter for Behavioral Health & Justice, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4734-7506
Richard N JonesDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-218X
Ted R MillerPacific Institute For Research and Evaluation, Calverton, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0958-2639
Jennifer E JohnsonCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-7213
Lauren M WeinstockDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-235X
Sheryl KubiakSchool of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-9142-5882

Funding

The National Center for Health and Justice Integration for Suicide PreventionP50MH127512 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Brian Kenneth Ahmedani, JENNIFER E JOHNSON · 2022 to 2026
$19.0M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH127512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide in local jails occurs at a higher rate than in the general population, requiring improvements to risk screening methods. Current suicide risk screening practices in jails are insufficient: They are commonly not conducted using validated screening instruments, not collected by clinically trained professionals, and unlikely to capture honest responses due to the chaotic nature of booking areas. Therefore, new technologies could improve such practices. Several studies have indicated that machine learning (ML) models considerably improve accuracy and have positive predictive value in detecting suicide risk compared with practice as usual (PAU). This study will use administrative data and ML modeling to improve suicide risk detection at jail booking.

objectiveThis study is primarily focused on gathering preliminary information about the feasibility and practicality of using administrative data and ML modeling for suicide risk detection but also incorporates elements of hypothesis testing pertaining to clinical outcomes.

methodsThe study uniquely contributes to our understanding of suicide risk by further validating an existing ML model developed and previously validated by the Mental Health Research Network using Medicaid outpatient health care claims data. This validation uses complete claims data on a sample of approximately 6000 individuals booked into 2 diverse jails in a midwestern state. This model validation uses 313 unique demographic and clinical characteristics from 5 years of historical health care data. It detects suicide risk in jails and postrelease by using merged jail, Medicaid, and vital records data. The study will use jail administrative data for September 1, 2021, through February 28, 2022; Medicaid records data for September 1, 2016, through March 31, 2023; and vital records data for March 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023.

resultsFirst, the algorithm will be validated on the data gathered for the jail sample using the C-statistic and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Second, the resulting model will be compared with the jails' suicide identification PAU to assess risk and detection of identified suicide attempts and deaths from intake through 120 days and 13 months after jail release. The funding timeline for this project is August 1, 2022, through July 31, 2025. The algorithm's predictions and actual event incidence will be linked and validated in the spring of 2025, with results ready for publication in the fall of 2025.

conclusionsThe study will also investigate implementation factors, such as feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, to optimize jail uptake. Interview data on the implementation factors will be gathered in the summer of 2025, with expected dissemination in 2026. We hypothesize that a combination of intake screening PAU and the ML model will be the optimal approach, in that the combination will be more accurate and can have practical application in this context. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/68517.

Indexed as

JailsMass ScreeningPrisonersSuicideSuicide PreventionAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMental HealthPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentUnited Stateshealth risk behaviorsjailsmachine learningsuicidesuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID40561472
PMCPMC12242057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.