SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025
Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Forced Migrant Populations: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of eHealth literacy in adult populations.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Self-care needs among international migrants and travellers: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- A Multilingual Digital Microlearning Intervention for Oral Health in Refugee Shelters: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Navigating perinatal mental health care: migrant women's experiences of support pathways and the role of digital resources.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Evaluating digital health literacy interventions for adults 45+ years: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- The association between internet use and health among rural-to-urban migrants in China: the mediating role of social integration.BMC public health · 2026Article
- "Lost in translation?": A qualitative exploration of digital perinatal mental health resource use among migrant women.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital health literacy (DHL), recognized as a key determinant of health, can influence health and well-being, improve health equity, and reduce health disparities. However, DHL is often limited among forced migrant populations, who usually lack the skills to understand and evaluate health information or to access and use digital health resources appropriately.
objectiveWe aimed to (1) identify effective interventions designed to improve DHL among forced migrant populations and (2) categorize and describe the characteristics of interventions that aim to improve the abilities of forced migrants or adapt digital health services to meet the needs and expectations of forced migrant populations limited by low levels of DHL.
methodsWe conducted a mixed methods systematic review according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines, involving an iterative process among the authors. A medical information specialist assisted in developing a search strategy for the 6 most relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, and PsycINFO) and the Google Scholar search engine, covering studies published between 2000 and 2022. Pairs of reviewers selected, individually and independently, titles, abstracts, and then full texts. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by 2 reviewers and validated by a senior researcher. We used narrative synthesis to provide a comprehensive overview of effective DHL interventions for forced migrant populations, highlighting their success factors.
resultsWe identified 1845 studies, of which only 6 (0.33%) were finally selected for narrative synthesis. Studies were excluded due to irrelevance, lack of primary data, or low methodological quality. The analysis revealed a diverse methodological landscape with a predominance of qualitative approaches aimed at understanding the challenges and needs of forced migrants concerning DHL. The main challenges were associated with cultural, linguistic, and practical contexts. Interventions targeted various groups, including older adults, individuals with low literacy or education, and those with limited digital experience. We identified 4 effective educational intervention categories to enhance DHL among forced migrants: education and training; education and social support; enabling and education; and social, educational, technological, and infrastructural support. Overall, most of the studies (5/6, 83%) reported positive results in terms of improving DHL among forced migrants.
conclusionsThis systematic review highlights the importance of improving DHL among forced migrant populations to promote their health and well-being. In addition, it provides comprehensive knowledge about effective interventions conducted with these groups. These findings can inform stakeholders, particularly policy makers, of the need to address low DHL among forced migrant populations. Going forward, these stakeholders need to develop innovative initiatives that rely on holistic approaches and are based on the specific needs of forced migrants to improve equity and health outcomes.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022373448; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022373448. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/50798.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.