ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Using an Integrated, Digital Framework to Standardize and Expand a Multisite Lung Cancer Screening Program.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health beliefs and lung cancer screening uptake among eligible Asian Americans in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLung cancer screening (LCS) is one of the most potentially impactful interventions of the past two decades for reducing lung cancer mortality. However, no current standard exists in the field for comprehensive data collection and tracking of LCS, despite availability of electronic health records (EHRs) and LCS management tools. In a widely expanding LCS program, harmonization of data becomes critical for decisions surrounding clinical care coordination and operational management.
methodsThis article summarizes the implementation of an integrated, digital framework within the Jefferson Health System using the Epic EHR and its customized SmartForms as well as Research Electronic Data Capture application. Leveraging these tools has allowed for standardized documentation across the LCS process continuum for each patient: LCS eligibility, shared decision making, low-dose computed tomography, and follow-up.
resultsSince the initial rollout in October 2022, 11 program sites across four regional hubs have adopted this framework. A standardized process paired with interoperability between systems has resulted in a centralized data repository, increased communication and transparency within and between program sites, and decreased duplicative or manual processes across the entire LCS program.
conclusionThe resultant digital framework is poised for scale-up and sustainment across the Jefferson Health System, and it can also be replicated across other LCS programs. Future iterations of the current work or adoption by other programs should take into account the complexities of the EHR itself and data provenance to ensure success. Active participation among stakeholders for synchronous coordination of building, implementing, and troubleshooting a comprehensive repository for LCS data can ultimately facilitate measurement of quality metrics and develop future research in early detection of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.