Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561285›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025

[Waiting lists in specialized outpatient care: reflections on a critical concept for Brazilian Unified National Health System].

Elaine Maria Giannotti, Marília Louvison, Arthur Chioro

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elaine Maria GiannottiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-8221-711X
Marília LouvisonUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1630-3463
Arthur ChioroUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-2342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The debate on the supply and organization of specialized outpatient care at the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) and the need to reduce waiting times for access to comprehensive and quality care has become one of the most important agendas for SUS managers and researchers in Health Policy, Planning, Management, and Evaluation and various civil society segments. This theme shows a gap in its theoretical, normative, and fundamental formulation to consolidate SUS as a comprehensive system with universal access. Some recent advances to face this serious problem have been implemented, such as the Brazilian National Policy for Specialized Health Care, of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, and the successful experiences of some state and municipal administrations. This essay was based on the theoretical reflections and experiences of its authors as SUS managers. It offers four reflections on the challenges to waiting lists. the first of which seeks to critically analyze whether long waiting lines really constitute the main problem for access to the SUS specialized outpatient care. This study then discusses the challenges to monitoring waiting times for specialized outpatient care access. The third point indicates and analyzes regulatory devices that have managed waiting lists, focusing on the needs of users. Finally, the fourth reflection addresses the need to produce and ensure transparency in the waiting lists for managers, workers, and users.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHealth Services AccessibilityNational Health ProgramsWaiting ListsBrazilHealth PolicyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40561285
PMCPMC12185040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.