Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561215›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2025

Italian Technostress Creators Scale: Validation of an Assessment Tool.

Maria Francesca Rossi, Flavia Beccia, Francesco Iantorno, Giuseppe Melcore, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Umberto Moscato

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Francesca RossiFrom the Department of Health Science and Public Health, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy (M.F.R., F.B., F.I., G.M., U.M.); Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, UniCamillus, Rome, Italy (M.R.G.); and Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Public Health Section, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (U.M.).
Flavia Beccia
Francesco Iantorno
Giuseppe Melcore
Maria Rosaria Gualano
Umberto Moscato

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a tool to assess technostress in Italian workers.

methodsA questionnaire was developed by back-translating the Technostress Creators Scale, adding sociodemographic questions, investigating work characteristics, frequency of technology use, etc. Exploratory factor analysis examined the underlying factor structure. Model fit was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsThe sample consisted of 90 participants, 53.3% female, mean age 37.4 (standard deviation ±10.9) years. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-factor structure explaining 58% of the variance, with factor loadings >0.40. CFE showed good fit indices ( χ2 / degrees of freedom = 4.02, comparative fit index = 0.926, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.915, root mean square error of approximation = 0.057, standardized root mean square residual = 0.079).

conclusionsThe Italian version of the Technostress Creators Scale showed good reliability. This validation is a starting point to develop new strategies to assess, evaluate, and prevent technostress in the workplace.

Indexed as

TechnologyAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceoccupational healthtechnostressTechnostress Creators Scalevalidation

Identifiers

PMID40561215
PMCPMC12871410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.