ArticlePloS one2025
In-silico study of approved drugs as potential inhibitors against 3CLpro and other viral proteins of CoVID-19.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global pandemic, due to the emergence of COVID-19, has created a public health crisis. It has a huge morbidity rate that was never comprehended in the recent decades. Despite numerous efforts, potent antiviral drugs are lacking. Repurposing of drugs presents a low-cost and rapid solution for finding new drugs by exploiting known drugs. In this study, we employed an integrated In-Silico approach using molecular docking and machine learning regression models to explore the potential inhibitors against key proteins of SARS-CoV-2. A library of 5903 drugs from the ZINC database was retrieved and screened against three crucial viral targets: Spike glycoprotein (7LM9), main protease 3CLpro (7JSU), and Nucleocapsid protein (7DE1). Binding affinities were predicted by using molecular docking, and subsequent predictive regression models, Decision Tree Regression (DTR), Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, Extra Trees, KNNR, and MLP, were constructed employing MACCS molecular fingerprints. Among them, the DTR model had better predictive performance, as indicated by the highest R² and lowest RMSE. The highest ranked compounds possessed good binding affinities (-12.6 to -19.7 kcal/mol) and favorable pharmacokinetics. Importantly, five novel candidate compounds, namely ZINC003873365, ZINC085432544, ZINC008214470, ZINC085536956, and ZINC261494640, had multi-target potential and optimal binding interaction. This computational analysis yields useful information for lead prioritization and sets the stage for additional in vitro and in vivo confirmation of these drug candidates to combat COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.