Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Laryngeal ultrasound for the prediction of severe laryngomalacia.

Arisa Duantaweesook, Vannipa Vathanophas, Kitirat Ungkanont, Archwin Tanphaichitr, Thanakrit Wannarong, Ramida Amornsitthiwat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arisa DuantaweesookDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Vannipa VathanophasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5633-0787
Kitirat UngkanontDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Archwin TanphaichitrDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanakrit WannarongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0001-5785-6331
Ramida AmornsitthiwatDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-7133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaryngeal ultrasound (LUS) is a noninvasive, painless, and radiation-free imaging method that presents a promising alternative, especially for the dynamic assessment of laryngeal structures. It can also be utilized by general practitioners. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy, patient comfort, and cost-effectiveness of LUS compared to flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL) for diagnosing laryngomalacia in infants aged ≤ 2 years with stridor-specific airway issues.

methodsA total of 43 infants presented with inspiratory stridor or other airway symptoms and underwent assessments using both flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy and laryngeal ultrasound. Laryngomalacia was diagnosed based on a vocal fold-arytenoid abduction angle of ≤120° and arytenoid and/or vocal fold collapse during inspiration. The diagnostic performance of LUS was compared with FFL, and the severity of the disease was evaluated. Both the pediatric endoscopist and radiologist were blinded to the patients' diagnoses and study results.

resultsA total of participants was included in the study, comprising 35% males and 65% females. The mean age of 4.52 ± 5.44 months and the mean weight of 4.62 ± 2.23 kg. Laryngomalacia was diagnosed in 60% of cases using FFL, with seven infants requiring surgical intervention; all were also identified as having laryngomalacia via LUS. LUS demonstrated diagnostic efficiency for laryngomalacia in 7 out of 19 infants, with a sensitivity of 26.92%, specificity of 100%, negative predictive value of 47.22%, and positive predictive value of 100%. The overall diagnostic accuracy of LUS was 55.8%.

conclusionWhile LUS cannot replace FFL as the primary diagnostic tool for infant laryngomalacia, it serves as a valuable adjunct for follow-up assessments and for identifying moderate to severe cases that may require surgical intervention. Further research and advancements in ultrasound technology may enhance diagnostic accuracy and broaden clinical applications for general practitioners.

Indexed as

LaryngomalaciaLarynxFemaleHumansInfantLaryngoscopyMaleSeverity of Illness IndexUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40561156
PMCPMC12193633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.