ArticlePloS one2025
Overlapping social structures behind Brazil's cesarean section births: A decomposition analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing cesarean section (CS) rates worldwide have prompted concern for women's access to quality care and calls for interventions to reduce unnecessary and risky CS. Brazil, where CS births outnumber vaginal births, has one of the highest CS rates in the world. Brazil is also a large and diverse nation, and CS rates differ widely between race/ethnic groups, social classes, and geographic regions. Residential segregation by race/ethnicity and their associations with social class complicate the picture of how each contributes to CS rates and disparities. This article untangles the intersecting social and contextual factors to identify opportunities for interventions to reduce overall CS rates as well as disparities in Brazil. Using Brazil's national birth registry data from 2019 (n = 2,567,039), this article quantifies how much socioeconomic, prenatal care, pregnancy risk, and geographic factors contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in CS. We applied the Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) decomposition method to multivariate logistic regression models. Our findings show that women's individual risk factors-educational attainment, social status, age, prenatal care, and pregnancy profile-were significant contributors but did not entirely explain racial and ethnic disparities in CS. Geographic factors-where race/ethnic groups tended to live and the region's risk for CS-also emerged as strong correlates of CS and partially explained unequal rates. The findings untangle the overlapping social structures that predispose some race and ethnic groups to a greater risk of CS and increase overall CS prevalence in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.