Article in The Plant cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Manikandan KalidassKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8397-3999
Venkata Ganesh JarubulaKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-4649-3684
Maryia RatnikavaKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1140-3801
Jothipriya Ramakrishnan ChandraKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-9332
Samuel Le GoffiGReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, BP 38, Clermont-Ferrand 63001, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9991-6435
Aline V ProbstiGReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, BP 38, Clermont-Ferrand 63001, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9534-8058
Silvia EspositoCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemistry Center, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, Regensburg D-93053, Germany.
Klaus D GrasserCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemistry Center, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, Regensburg D-93053, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-5520
Astrid BruckmannInstitute for Biochemistry I, Center for Biochemistry, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, Regensburg D-93053, Germany.
Jérôme F GagneuxDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Reinier F ProséeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Twan RuttenKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5891-6503
Veit SchubertKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3072-0485
Dmitri DemidovKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-1023
Esther LechnerInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 12 rue Général Zimmer, Strasbourg Cedex 67084, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4574-3126
Florian A SteinerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Genetics and Genomics in Geneva, Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0514-5060
Pascal GenschikInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 12 rue Général Zimmer, Strasbourg Cedex 67084, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4107-5071
Inna LermontovaKinetochore Biology, Department of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr 3, Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3386-2590
Funding
Agence National de Recherche ANR-11 JSV2 009 01COST Action INDEPTH CA16212Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG LE 2299/5-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG LE 2299/8-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB960-A6GDR EPIPLANTSwiss National Science Foundation 310030_197762Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_175606Université de Strasbourg IdEx Unistra ANR-10-IDEX-0002
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Kinetochores are large protein complexes that serve as attachment sites for spindle microtubules, ensuring proper chromosome segregation during cell division. KINETOCHORE NULL2 (αKNL2) is a key kinetochore protein required for the incorporation of the centromeric histone variant CENH3. The precise regulation of αKNL2 levels is crucial, but the molecular mechanisms controlling this process remain largely unexplored. In this study, we demonstrated that the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) mediates the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of αKNL2 during mitosis. Our findings revealed that αKNL2 accumulates in the presence of 26S proteasome inhibitors, and our yeast 2-hybrid and proteomic screens showed that proteins from the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway interact with KNL2 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans). Arabidopsis αKNL2 directly interacts with Anaphase-Promoting Complex subunit 10 (APC10) and Cell Division Cycle 20.1 (CDC20.1), 2 substrate recognition components of the APC/C. RNAi-mediated depletion of APC/C resulted in the accumulation and mislocalization of endogenous αKNL2. Additionally, mutation or deletion of the D-box1 region, or substitution of residues K336 and K339, impaired αKNL2 degradation. The expression of a proteasome-resistant αKNL2 variant in planta caused severe defects in growth, fertility, and mitotic division. These findings show that APC/CCDC20-mediated degradation of αKNL2 is critical for proper kinetochore function and centromere integrity.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of KNL2 driven by APC/CCDC20 is critical for centromere integrity and mitotic fidelity. · full record | OpenQuestion