ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of age on the neural correlates of auditory working memory in cochlear implant users.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Clinic to Reality: Integrating Sound Field Testing and Hearing Quality Measures in Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cognitive function and speech outcomes after cochlear implantation in older adults.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a conversation in a noisy environment is challenging, especially for individuals who received cochlear implants (CIs) to remediate severe-to-profound hearing loss. CI users likely work harder than their normal-hearing counterparts to understand speech in adverse listening conditions. Recruiting cognitive resources can be taxing and may interfere with attentional regulation and working memory processes. Few studies have, however, examined the impact of CIs on the neural correlates of attention and working memory. We used a high-density electroencephalogram to investigate behavioural and neural correlates of auditory attention and working memory in 14 CI users and age-matched normal hearing (NH) controls (age ranges: 21-75). All participants completed an auditory n-back task with zero- and two-back memory load conditions. Behaviourally, CI users were slower in identifying targets during the two-back condition, especially older adults. The sensory-evoked responses were reduced in CI users compared to NH. With increasing memory load, younger CI users and NH controls displayed decreased amplitudes, while older CI users showed no change in amplitude. We also observed reduced frontal theta synchrony and greater alpha/beta desynchrony in CI users where alpha/beta in the left inferior frontal gyrus was related to slower response times in CI users. Attenuated frontotemporal connectivity was also evident compared to NH. These findings suggest that CI users adapt to higher task demands by allocating more attentional resources while encoding and maintaining stimuli in working memory. This pattern of activity potentially indexes a delay in identification and possible neural correlates of cognitive deficits while aging with a CI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.