ArticlePloS one2025
Left ventricular segmentation method based on optimized UNet and improved CBAM: ESV and EDV tracking study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces an optimized nested UNet model for automated left ventricular segmentation in cardiac function assessment. We utilize the EchoNet-Dynamic dataset, which contains both video data and expert annotations. Unlike conventional methods such as DeepLabv3 that struggle with large model sizes and imprecise segmentation, Our proposed model introduces a deeper feature extraction module to effectively capture multi-scale features and reduce computational overhead. By integrating the CBAM (Attention module) attention mechanism and a lightweight SimAM (Simple Attention Module) module, we enhance feature selectivity and minimize redundancy. To further stabilize training and address gradient issues, we combine binary cross-entropy and Dice loss functions. Experimental results reveal that our model significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving a 1.05% increase in the Dice coefficient and reducing model size to 15% of the original. These improvements not only enhance the accuracy of cardiac function assessments but also provide a more efficient solution for automated diagnosis in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.