ArticlePloS one2025
Experiences of Indigenous and ethnic minority women with culturally safe healthcare in Europe: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Teeth Present and Quality of Life in Older Adults from Indigenous Communities in the Peruvian Amazon: A Cross-Sectional Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Observational
- Health responsibility among marginalized women in Mashhad, northeastern Iran: a critical ethnographic study.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Gender Bias and Discrimination in Healthcare as Experienced by Basque Women and Gender Non-normative Individuals in the Basque Country.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, Indigenous and ethnic minority women encounter discrimination in access to high quality healthcare and other advantageous social determinants of health. Cultural safety is the concept of proactively considering social, economic, and political situations, and power relationships in healthcare. By identifying ways in which culturally unsafe healthcare practices can intensify institutional discrimination and replicate traumatic experiences in historically oppressed populations, interventions may be crafted to improve patient experiences and outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a scoping review of research on experiences with culturally safe healthcare among adult Indigenous and ethnic minority women in Europe. All research articles within Europe, without set date parameters, addressing the experiences of individuals who self-identify as adult women or gender non-normative individuals who are members of Indigenous or ethnic minority communities were included. A total of four peer reviewed articles were identified for this scoping review. Participants in four studies described healthcare providers' lack of knowledge of their culture and healthcare needs. The studies suggest that this lack of knowledge may lead to patient sentiments of inferiority, prejudice, increased barriers to access care, inadequate healthcare intervention and ineffective healthcare service. The articles propose the implementation of cultural safety to close the gap of health disparities in Indigenous and ethnic minority populations. There are limited data on the implementation of cultural safety in Europe, potentially indicating a lack of awareness regarding the concept of cultural safety or its core tenets, as well as regarding the importance of culture, racism and biases in healthcare related to ethnic minority populations. Overall, this scoping review reiterates the gap in research and knowledge in the implementation of culturally safe healthcare in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.