Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561078›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Validating self-administration as an agile modality for high-frequency diet quality data collection.

Rhys Manners, Anna W Herforth, Maria Delfine, Rosil Hesen, Didier Nkubito, Karin Borgonjen-van den Berg, Eric Matsiko, Marguerite Niyibituronsa, Betül T M Uyar, Elise F Talsma

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rhys MannersInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0009-0008-7779-2348
Anna W HerforthDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6079-9374
Maria DelfineDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands.
Rosil HesenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands.
Didier NkubitoStrategic Development and Research Group, Kigali, Rwanda.
Karin Borgonjen-van den BergDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands.
Eric MatsikoUniversity of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Marguerite NiyibituronsaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB).
Betül T M UyarDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands.
Elise F TalsmaDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data collection of diet quality is important to estimate global dietary transitions affecting public health. Mobile-phone based tools can provide a low-cost and rapidly deployable modality to complement enumerator-collected data. This study validated self-administration of the Diet Quality Questionnaire using mobile phones, comparing accuracy against enumerator administration, measuring both against an observed benchmark. Quantitative dietary intake data were gathered from 308 participants in northwest Rwanda, using a weighed food record. Intake data were used to calculated 'observed' responses to the questionnaire, half the participants responding to enumerators, and the other half using a mobile-administered version of the questionnaire. After filtering for low quality data, agreement in observed and reported responses, for all questionnaire questions, were statistically compared. Agreement rates (observed-reported) of self-administered and enumerated responses were high (91% vs 95%, p = 0.05), respectively. Agreement was significantly lower for the mobile-administered modality among older and lower income respondents (by about 5 percentage points), with no significant differences by gender or time of response. Mobile-administration cost approximately USD 0.70 per response, versus the marginal cost of USD 0.79 for the enumerator-administered. Our results confirm self-administered reporting by mobile-phone as a valid, low-cost method for collecting dietary data, with only marginal (yet significant for some subgroups) differences in agreement rates, compared to enumerated data. Data collection by mobile phone represents an agile complement to enumerated collection, administrable in the absence of existing survey platforms; and provides a useful option for high-frequency data collection to monitor dietary dynamics in target sub-populations.

Indexed as

Data CollectionDietDiet SurveysSelf AdministrationAdolescentAdultAgedCell PhoneDiet RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40561078
PMCPMC12193772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.