Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40561063›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Opportunities and challenges in access to healthcare for international migrants with work-related diseases and injuries in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A systematic literature review protocol.

Weijun Yu, Aleena Dawer, Jeanetta Floyd, Nicole Saad, Jiaqin Wu, Katherine O Robsky, Oliver Johnson, Yulia Hutsul, Dylan Ratnarajah, Bryan Shaw and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Weijun YuCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0771-5581
Aleena DawerGlobal Health Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0002-0213-8102
Jeanetta FloydCollege of Arts and Sciences, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Nicole SaadCollege of Arts and Sciences, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Jiaqin WuCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Katherine O RobskyCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7789-5779
Oliver JohnsonGlobal Health Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Yulia HutsulWalsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Dylan RatnarajahSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0000-7409-0625
Bryan ShawCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Martine Etienne-MesubiCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Deus BaziraCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6459-5555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInternational labor migrants form a significant part of the global workforce, particularly in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which host around 11% of the world's migrant workforce. This high concentration presents unique challenges in healthcare access and delivery. This systematic review aims to evaluate whether international labor migrants in GCC countries have effective access to healthcare for work-related diseases and injuries and to propose evidence-based recommendations for policy and healthcare interventions.

methodsWe will include studies from 2013 to 2023 published in peer-reviewed journals in English or Arabic (with English abstracts) available on PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. Search strategies are developed using MeSH terms and key terms related to our study population (international labor immigrants), context (the GCC countries), and exposure (migrant status; work-related diseases and injuries). The screening process involves two stages: initial review of titles/abstracts and full-text review. Studies meeting eligibility criteria and focusing on our primary outcome (access to healthcare) will be included. Data extraction will cover study characteristics, population demographics, described exposures, outcomes measured, and key findings. Given the expected heterogeneity, narrative synthesis will be primarily used, with meta-analysis as an option. DISCUSSION: By considering both migrant workers and expatriate professionals, we provide a culturally tailored perspective. Methodological rigor is ensured through the gold standard screening process, where at least two reviewers independently screen the literature at each stage, with a senior reviewer resolving discrepancies. We will identify barriers, facilitators, and inform targeted interventions for policymakers. Our findings will support evidence-based strategies to improve healthcare access for international labor migrants in the GCC countries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review protocol was registered on the international registry PROSPERO (CRD42024532851) on April 21, 2024.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityOccupational DiseasesOccupational InjuriesTransients and MigrantsHumansMiddle EastSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40561063
PMCPMC12193948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.