ArticlePloS one2025
Personalized machine learning models for noninvasive hypoglycemia detection in people with type 1 diabetes using a smartwatch: Insights into feature importance during waking and sleeping times.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypoglycemia is a major challenge for people with diabetes. Therefore, glycemic monitoring is an important aspect of diabetes management. However, current methods such as finger pricking and continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) are invasive, and hypoglycemia has still been shown to occur despite advancements in CGMS. Consequently, a growing body of research has been directed toward noninvasive hypoglycemia detection, relying on data from medical devices and wearables that can record physiological changes elicited by hypoglycemia. Consumer-grade wearables such as smartwatches remain an attractive yet underexplored candidate for such applications. Therefore, we explored the potential of a consumer-grade wearable for hypoglycemia prediction and investigated differing feature importance during waking and sleeping times. Smartwatch data from 18 adults with type 1 diabetes was collected, preprocessed, and imputed. Machine learning (ML) models were built using a tree-based ensemble algorithm to detect hypoglycemic events registered by CGMS. Models were built in a personalized manner using the same participant's data for training and testing, with separate modeling for daytime and nighttime. The relative importance of input features on model decisions was analyzed using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Seventeen personalized models were built with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) score of 0.74 ± 0.08. Average specificity and sensitivity were 0.76 ± 0.18 and 0.71 ± 0.15, respectively. Time-of-day, activity, and cardiac features showed comparable importance in daytime models (29.9%, 28.5%, and 24%, respectively), while in nighttime models, cardiac features demonstrated the highest importance (42.2%) followed by time-of-day features (37.5%) and respiratory features (15.2%). In summary, we demonstrate the potential of consumer-grade wearables in noninvasive hypoglycemia detection. By additionally considering different physiological states (waking and sleeping) during modeling, our results offer further insights into differences in relative feature importance influencing the model's decision, guiding future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.