ArticlePloS one2025
Construction of VAE-GRU-XGBoost intrusion detection model for network security.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of the big data era, the threat of network security is becoming increasingly severe. In order to cope with complex network attacks and ensure network security, a network intrusion detection model is constructed relying on deep learning technology. In order to extract and analyze network intrusion features, this study uses variational auto-encoders to extract and reduce the dimensionality of the invaded network traffic, and combines the advantages of extreme gradient boosting to perform classification tasks. Finally, a network intrusion detection model for network security is constructed by combining the gated recurrent unit. The results showed the area under the curve of the research model reached 97.48% and 95.24% in the KDD99 dataset and OODS dataset, respectively. In the confusion matrix experiment, the model achieved classification accuracy greater than 0.91 for different attack traffic samples in both the training and testing sets. When the sample sizes were 10000 and 40000, the shortest time and longest feature extraction time of the model were 0.030s and 0.112s, respectively. In summary, the constructed model on the basis of improved variational auto-encoder for network security has high accuracy in network intrusion detection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.