ArticlePloS one2025
A crowding free digital interface to help French-speaking children learn to read.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning to read is a challenging task for first-graders. Letter crowding in the peripheral visual field has been identified as a key interference process during reading acquisition. To reduce crowding and enhance selective attention, we designed a new way to read (Digit-tracking) in which words and sentences appear blurred. By sliding the index finger along the blurred text, the letters just above the finger position appear unblurred and are seen in foveal vision. We hypothesized that this approach might facilitate orthographic decoding and promote reading skills. Using a tablet device, two groups of first-grade children (N = 54) were trained on digit-tracking exercises and paper exercises using a crossover design. Results showed that performance in letter, syllable and meaningless text-reading was significantly higher after digit-tracking training compared to paper-based training. Using the recorded finger trajectories as a proxy for eye movements, we found that text scanning patterns (saccade length, landing position, regressive saccades) predicted children's decoding and fluency. We conclude that training with the digit-tracking procedure accelerates decoding and reading fluency in school beginners and may provide a sensitive metric of reading competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.