ArticlePloS one2025
Numerical simulation and parallel implementation of freight train air brake system.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerical simulations of railway air brake systems are becoming increasingly computationally demanding due to the growing complexity and length of trains. This study introduces a parallel computing-enhanced model for simulating pressure dynamics in heavy-haul trains. The proposed approach assigns dedicated threads to each vehicle, with additional threads managing the interface fluxes of brake pipe connections, and is implemented in C# using the ThreadPool and Parallel libraries. A train configuration consisting of one locomotive and 116 vehicles was simulated under various brake pipe pressure reduction conditions. The validity of the air braking system simulation model was confirmed through comparisons with experimental data. Furthermore, the impact of parallel computing on simulation efficiency was investigated. The results indicate that the efficiency of serial computing is primarily influenced by the CPU Boost Clock frequency. Parallel computing consistently outperforms serial computing, with speedup ratios increasing as the number of CPU threads grows. Although the simulation partitions tasks by vehicle units, the computations remain sufficiently fine-grained that the ThreadPool implementation outperforms the Parallel library, as it eliminates the dynamic scheduling overhead inherent to Parallel's workload distribution mechanism. Additionally, parallel computing efficiency improves as the number of vehicles increases; however, beyond a certain threshold, efficiency stabilizes as workload distribution becomes fully optimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.