ArticlePloS one2025
Altering gillnet soak duration and timing minimizes bycatch and maintains target catch.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altering gillnet soak duration and timing minimizes bycatch and maintains target catch.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seabirds are one of the most at-risk avian groups worldwide, and incidental catch in fishing practices is one of the top threats for seabirds globally. Seabirds that forage on fish through surface feeding, pursuit-diving, or plunge-diving are particularly vulnerable to bycatch. Bycatch mitigation solutions are therefore a vital component of global seabird conservation, but owing to the episodic nature of bycatch and its involvement of match-mismatch contingencies, results from existing efforts involving gear additions (e.g., lights, flags, or buoys) are highly varied and, at times, reduce target catch. Altering the time during which gear remains in the water and modifying fishing practices based on the activity patterns of target fish and seabirds is a promising option for bycatch mitigation. We experimentally tested best practices for the soak timing and duration of shallow-set gillnets used in the Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) bait fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. We compared catch, bycatch, and seabird activity among control (ca. 24 h) and short (ca. 12 h) set durations that were left to soak overnight or only during daylight hours. Target catch did not differ between control and short overnight sets but was greatly reduced during short daytime sets. Nearly all bycatch, including all seabird bycatch, occurred during the control sets. Seabirds associated with fishing vessels throughout the day. Since the catch of herring in gillnets occurs at night outside of most coastal seabirds' foraging period, we recommend that fishers continue to haul their nets early every morning to minimize the time where shallow-set nets are filled with prey during daytime hours, thereby limiting seabird bycatch risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.