Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560914›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Design and comparative analysis of laser-based array systems for UAV detection in surveillance zones.

Meriem Salhi, Maha Sliti, Noureddine Boudriga, Abdelrahman Elfikky, Sarra Ayouni

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meriem SalhiUniversity of Carthage, Higher School of Communication of Tunis (SUP'COM), LR11TIC04, Communication Networks and Security Research Lab. & LR11TIC02, Green and Smart Communication Systems Research Lab, Ariana, Tunisia.
Maha SlitiUniversity of Carthage, Higher School of Communication of Tunis (SUP'COM), LR11TIC04, Communication Networks and Security Research Lab. & LR11TIC02, Green and Smart Communication Systems Research Lab, Ariana, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-8296-6284
Noureddine BoudrigaUniversity of Carthage, Higher School of Communication of Tunis (SUP'COM), Ariana, Tunisia.
Abdelrahman ElfikkyArab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Support, Alexandria, Egypt.
Sarra AyouniDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-6238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is critical to protecting vital locations and infrastructures from potential attacks. The literature suggests a variety of detection methods, including conventional radar systems, acoustic detection, radio frequency signal detection, LiDAR, and camera-based techniques. LiDAR systems, in particular, offer high-resolution 3D mapping and precise distance measurements, which prove to be highly effective for detecting and tracking UAVs under various environmental conditions. This study presents two innovative LiDAR systems for UAV detection: a multi-array static LiDAR system and a one-array rotating LiDAR system. The multi-array static LiDAR employs arrays of laser light sources and concentrators arranged along a spherical shape. A central photodiode receives the transmittance of the reflected optical energy captured by the concentrators, enabling the precise identification of UAVs. The system's design focuses on achieving continuous, high-resolution coverage with minimal delay, making it suitable for monitoring wide areas. In contrast, the one-array rotating LiDAR utilizes a single array with rotational motion to scan the surveillance area. This approach prioritizes compactness and energy efficiency, which makes it advantageous for cost-sensitive applications. However, the rotational mechanism introduces trade-offs, such as increased mechanical wear and scanning latency. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of the design characteristics, this study evaluates the practicability and efficiency of these LiDAR solutions. Parameters such as the dimensions of the monitored region, sensor characteristics, component arrangement, and interspacing are considered to assess the effectiveness of both systems in identifying potential UAV threats.

Indexed as

LasersUnmanned Aerial DevicesEquipment DesignRadar

Identifiers

PMID40560914
PMCPMC12194041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.