Observational studyPloS one2025
Gender differences in trunk appearance perception and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing orthotic treatment: An observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D back surface asymmetry reflects radiographic deformity but not patient perception in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthotic treatment is commonly used as a non-surgical intervention for managing moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Although prior studies have evaluated various factors influencing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the patients with AIS, the association between trunk appearance perception and HRQoL, including potential gender differences, remains insufficiently defined. This study investigated gender differences in trunk appearance perception and its relationship with QoL among the patients with moderate AIS undergoing orthotic treatment.
methodsPatients with moderate AIS undergoing orthotic treatment were included, and HRQoL evaluations were conducted before treatment, as well as one and seven months after the initiation of orthotic treatment. The evaluation tools included the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS), Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r), and Brace Questionnaire (BrQ). The study time points were selected to capture baseline conditions, initial adaptation, and longer-term treatment effects.
resultsA total of 34 females and 11 males participated in the study. No significant gender differences were observed in global HRQoL, with both groups consistently reporting low self-image and self-esteem. In females, increasing age was negatively correlated with TAPS scores, whereas in males, it showed a positive correlation. For females, higher compliance was associated with higher bodily pain scores on the BrQ (ρ = 0.417), indicating reduced pain levels. In contrast, among males, greater compliance was associated with poor trunk appearance perception after seven months (ρ = -0.619). While TAPS was unrelated to SRS-22r and BrQ in females, a more favorable trunk appearance in males was strongly related to better function and self-image scores on the SRS-22r after seven months (ρ = 0.614 and 0.703, respectively).
conclusionTrunk appearance perception and overall HRQoL were similar between females and males in this study. However, the score related to self-image was lower than other HRQoL domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.