Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The 2 Sigma Genus Concept in mammalogy: Lessons from Lasiurus.

Amy B Baird, Janet K Braun, Mark D Engstrom, Burton K Lim, Michael A Mares, Luis A Ruedas, John C Patton, John W Bickham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amy B BairdDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Houston - Downtown, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-6399
Janet K BraunSam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Mark D EngstromRoyal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Burton K LimRoyal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael A MaresSam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Luis A RuedasDepartment of Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Biology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
John C Patton5000 Quartz Lane, Midland, Texas, United States of America.
John W BickhamDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species concepts are well established and apply across diverse groups of organisms; however, there is no consensus on what defines higher taxonomic groups. The genus rank is important to taxonomists because it comprises part of the scientific name of an organism. A consistent and biologically meaningful method for determining generic status is needed for taxonomic stability and utility. Lasiurine bats are a group for which there is disagreement on how many genera to recognize. Some authors argue for splitting this group into three genera based on morphology, genetic divergence, and time of divergence; others argue that a single genus should be maintained. Here, we use lasiurines to explore generic-level taxonomy and how it is applied. Genetic divergence levels are compared among sister genera and within genera of vespertilionine bats using Cytochrome b (Cytb) sequences. We used Cytb because it is the most sequenced mitochondrial gene in mammals, but other genes might be more appropriate for a different taxon. Future methods will eventually use complete mitogenomes and genomes. We conclude that lasiurine bats are most appropriately divided into three genera to maintain taxonomic consistency within their subfamily. Since Linnaeus, the quarter millennium of progress in the science of mammalogy has provided a binomial nomenclatural basis from which can be extracted an acceptable range of genetic diversity upon which to establish generic level taxonomy. We offer a biologically meaningful operational definition of the genus, which we call the 2 Sigma Genus Concept, based on genetic divergence between a genus and its sister genus or lineage and compared to the divergence between sister pairs of established genera in the same higher taxonomic category. Our method is phylogenetic; sister genera are based on the best phylogeny for the higher taxonomic category. Genera must be monophyletic and differ from their closest relatives by not more than two standard deviations above or below the mean value of genetic distance for the larger taxonomic group in which they are contained. There should be genetic-based characters (e.g., morphology, protein structure, behavior) that are diagnostic for each genus. Our method is novel in that it uses the statistical distribution of sister divergences within a higher category to guide the allocation of generic status to monophyletic lineages. Within Vespertilioninae, the mean genetic distance between sister genera is 20.68% ± 3.89% (K2P) for the Cytb gene. Therefore, a proposed new genus should have >12.90% genetic distance to its sister genus. Genera that are > 2 standard deviations above the mean (>28.46%) are candidates to be recognized as a higher category such as tribe or subfamily. The sister-genus divergence for the monophyletic lineage that includes all lasiurine bats is 31.14% ± 1.64% which qualifies it as a higher category (i.e., tribe), and the sister-genus divergences of the three monophyletic lineages within Lasiurini (i.e., red, yellow and hoary bats) are 21.77% and 22.91% which qualifies them for genera. We show the applicability of the method beyond Vespertilioninae by providing a case study where we apply it in a distantly related subfamily of bats.

Indexed as

ChiropteraAnimalsCytochromes bGenetic VariationPhylogenySpecies SpecificityCytochromes b

Identifiers

PMID40560834
PMCPMC12193745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.