Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560618›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

The effects of social media criticism against public health institutions on trust, emotions, and social media engagement.

Jonathan Y Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Analyzing multiple mediators in multiple single-mediator models leads to wrong conclusions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. The effects of social media criticism against public health institutions on trust, emotions, and social media engagement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan Y LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-1267-948X

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
HHS | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR003142NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142Vaccine Confidence Fund (VCF) VCF - 008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, trust in US public health and science institutions has faced unprecedented declines, particularly among Republicans/conservatives. To what extent might institutional criticism on social media be responsible for such politically polarized declines in institutional trust? Two online survey experiments (total

Indexed as

EmotionsPublic HealthSocial MediaTrustAdultCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.FemaleHumansMalePoliticsUnited Statesinstitutional trustmoral outragepolarizationpoliticizationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID40560618
PMCPMC12232729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.