ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Consensus Guideline for the Management of Malignant Gastrointestinal Obstruction in Patients with Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ASO Author Reflections: The Challenge of Peritoneal Metastases in Patients with Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Options and Considerations in the Management of Peritoneal Disease in Patients with Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- ASO Author Reflections: Partial Nephrectomy: Insight from Comparisons Between Robot-Assisted and Open Approaches.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Defining a 'cells to society' research framework for appendiceal tumours.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalignant gastrointestinal obstruction (MGIO), a frequent complication of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM), often portends a poor prognosis. The lack of high-quality evidence on optimal management strategies necessitated a national consensus to address this clinical problem.
methodsA clinical management pathway was designed through a Delphi consensus process with national experts in peritoneal disease. Two rounds of voting were conducted to assess agreement levels with pathway blocks. Supporting evidence regarding procedural interventions for MGIO underwent evaluation via a rapid literature review.
resultsOf 111 participants responding in the first round, 90 (81%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in 4/6 and 6/6 pathway blocks during rounds I and II, respectively. Encouraging a multidisciplinary approach, the pathway emphasized early palliative care assessments and iterative goals of care evaluation throughout treatment. Management was delineated on the basis of obstruction acuity, and selection criteria for palliative-intent surgical interventions and stenting were elucidated. Studies demonstrated limited benefits for such interventions in patients with multifocal obstructions, poor performance status, and high-grade and/or high-burden PSMs. In these cases, a recommendation for supportive care or upper GI decompression tube placement was favored. The overall level of evidence was generally low-moderate in existing literature.
conclusionsGiven limited evidence, the consensus-driven pathway provides crucial clinical guidance for practitioners dealing with MGIO in patients with PSM. There is a need for high-quality prospective evidence in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.