ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
A Survey of Preferences for Sensing Technologies in People with Severe Mental Illness Admitted to an Acute Psychiatric Unit.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Sharing of Digital Health Data in the Veterans Health Administration: Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study presents the views of patients admitted to an adult acute mental health unit due to an acute episode of severe mental illness, mainly of a psychotic nature, regarding sensing technology.
methodsOne hundred and twenty five adult inpatients were approached; 31 patients declined to participate whilst eleven patients were missed due to having been discharged from hospital or transferred to a different unit. Eighty three patients consented to participate and were administered a survey, previously validated in people with arthritis and other physical health conditions, about their preferences regarding sensing technology. The participants' clinical presentation was characterised using standard clinical instruments.
resultsNinety percent of participants were on antipsychotic medication and 78% were detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983 of England and Wales. 67.9% exhibited elevated levels of ideas of reference and 61.7% presented a clinical level of persecutory delusions. Patients' views about wearable digital technology were broadly positive and similar to those previously provided by people with arthritis and physical health conditions, with some specific differences. For example, they agreed to wear a device that is visible to others but less so to wearing one that is concealed in their clothing or implanted or for 24 h monitoring with the data being sent away, analysed or stored.
conclusionThis study shows that those who are in the middle of an acute and severe episode of mental ill health are open to using sensing technology, with some specific requirements that would increase the uptake within this patient population. This research shows that this currently underserved patient population has a positive view with regards to sensing technology for healthcare purposes. These findings can inform the design of new wearable systems, which can address the unmet needs in this clinical domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.