Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560448›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2025

Efficiency of the extracellular polymeric matrix disruptor Zerumbone in combination with Photodithazine® in the photodynamic inactivation of monospecies biofilms.

César Augusto Abreu-Pereira, Ana Luiza Gorayb-Pereira, Cláudia Carolina Jordão, Gabriel Popazoglo Bitencourt, Eduardo Maffud Cilli, Ana Cláudia Pavarina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Zerumbone combined with antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation reduces growth of Candida albicans biofilms and modulates virulence gene expression.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

César Augusto Abreu-PereiraSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Gorayb-PereiraSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Cláudia Carolina JordãoSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Gabriel Popazoglo BitencourtSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Eduardo Maffud CilliSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Ana Cláudia PavarinaSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil. ana.pavarina@unesp.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico #150896/2024-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico #306533/ 2023-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2013/07276-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão 190480/2021-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zerumbone (ZER), a sesquiterpene extracted from Zingiber zerumbet (L.) Smith, enhances the antibiofilm effects of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) by reducing the extracellular matrix of biofilms and increasing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) when applied prior to aPDT. To reduce treatment application time, ZER was combined with Photodithazine® (PDZ) in a single solution. Then, this study investigated the potential of aPDT mediated by a mixture of ZER with PDZ in the inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, fluconazole-susceptible (CaS) and resistant (CaR) Candida albicans biofilms. The solutions of ZER, PDZ and their mixture (ZER + PDZ) were analyzed using absorbance spectroscopy (AS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and mass spectrometry (MS) to confirm the absence of molecular alterations in the mixture of ZER + PDZ. 48 h-biofilms were growth and treatments were performed: 1-ZER (256 µg/mL); 2-PDZ (200 µg/mL); 3-PDZ + LED; 4-ZER + PDZ + LED; 5- MIX (ZER + PDZ) + LED; Control (without treatment). Irradiation was performed using a red LED (660 nm, 50 J/cm², 30 mW/cm²). Sterile PBS was employed as the control group. For cytotoxicity assessments ffi broblast (HGF) and keratinocyte (NOK-si) oral cells were cultured for 24 h and submitted to treatments. Both ZER + PDZ + LED and MIX (ZER + PDZ) + LED groups showed the greatest statistically significant reduction in CFU/mL when compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.011) in all evaluated strain, with no significant difference between them (p ≥ 0.218). The reduction observed was 2.74, 2.89, 2.45 and 2.07 log

Indexed as

BiofilmsExtracellular MatrixPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsSesquiterpenesCandida albicansEscherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusPhotosensitizing AgentsSesquiterpeneszerumbone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.