SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025
Global prevalence and etiologies of urinary tract infection among oncologic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy can lead to severe and prolonged immunosuppression, which puts oncologic patients at a higher risk of UTIs. This review determined the global prevalence and etiologic agents of UTIs among oncologic patients.
methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for reporting. The article search was performed via PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Hinari, Web of Science, Science Direct, and African Journals Online. Data were extracted via a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed via STATA version 11.0. A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled effect size across the studies. The heterogeneity was checked via the I
resultsEighteen articles were eligible for this review. The pooled estimate of UTI incidence was 34.39% (95% CI: 22.29-46.49), with high heterogeneity (I
conclusionThere is a significant global burden of UTIs (34.39%) in oncologic patients. This requires regular screening of UTIs in oncologic patients to minimize further complications, better monitoring, and early treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.