Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560428›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Using a syringe as tubular retractor and working channel in minimally invasive cranial and spinal neurosurgery.

Guenther C Feigl, Daniel Staribacher, Iván N Camal Ruggieri, Gavin Britz, Dzmitry Kuzmin

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guenther C FeiglDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. guenther.feigl@web.de.
Daniel StaribacherDepartment of Neurosurgery, General Hospital Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
Iván N Camal RuggieriDepartment of Neurosurgery, General Hospital Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
Gavin BritzDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Dzmitry KuzminDepartment of Neurosurgery, General Hospital Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany. dzimitrykuzmin@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive spinal and cranial neurosurgery often requires tissue retraction. However, excessive tissue retraction is contrary to the principles of minimally invasive neurosurgery. Therefore, any retractor used should be small and atraumatic. Circular plastic retractors made from syringes of various sizes meet these requirements. We report a case series of patients with various cranial and spinal pathologies who underwent surgeries using "self-made" retractors made from plastic syringes of various sizes (2 mL, 5 mL, and 10 mL). All surgeries were performed via minimally invasive approaches. In all cases, the goals of surgical treatment were achieved with no neurological deficits. The use of "self-made" plastic retractors can be helpful in spinal and cranial minimally invasive neurosurgery. Making retractors from plastic syringes and using them is not labor-intensive. This method can extend the possibilities of the neurosurgeon, especially in the field of minimally invasive neurosurgery. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeurosurgical ProceduresSyringesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedKeyhole neurosurgeryRetractorSyringe

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.