ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Role of elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreas transplantation rejection.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Donor-derived Cell-free DNA for Detection of Rejection After Pancreas Transplantation.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRejection is the leading cause of graft failure, and its diagnosis remains a challenge. Elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) are novel non-invasive techniques for quantifying tissue elasticity and perfusion. Their role in pancreas graft rejection has not yet been defined. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom October 16 to January 20, all pancreas transplantations performed at our institution were prospectively studied with elastography and DCE-US at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 12 months post-transplantation. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 3 weeks and 12 months. Elastography and DCE-US were also conducted in all requested biopsies during this period (regardless of the date of transplantation). Patients were categorized according to the biopsy result: normal/rejection. Grafts with other complications were excluded. Cut-off values were established.
resultsOne hundred twenty-one elastography and 127 DCE-US in 56 patients were included. All parameters showed a high dispersion during the first 90 days post-transplantation. After this period, the rejection group presented higher stiffness (0.97 vs 1.46 m/s, p < 0.001) and lower perfusion. The optimal cut-off value for elastography was 1.27 m/s (AUC 0.80), and for DCE-US were: peak enhancement 601 a.u. (AUC 0.67), wash-in AUC 2748 a.u. (AUC 0.70), wash-in rate 118 a.u. (AUC 0.65), wash-in perfusion index 369 a.u. (AUC 0.67), wash-out AUC 5181 a.u. (AUC 0.69) and total AUC 6388 a.u. (AUC 0.68). A combined predictive score showed that alteration of elastography and DCE-US was associated with a 23.2-fold probability of rejection.
conclusionAfter the first 90 days post-transplantation, pancreas graft rejection is associated with higher stiffness and lower graft perfusion. KEY POINTS: Question Pancreas graft rejection remains a clinical challenge, as there are currently no reliable non-invasive tests for its diagnosis. Findings After the first 90 days post-transplantation, elastography and DCE-US show higher stiffness and lower pancreas graft perfusion in the presence of rejection. Clinical relevance These non-invasive tools, which can be easily integrated into daily routine practice, may be useful in identifying grafts at higher risk of rejection, allowing closer follow-up or early biopsy to establish early rejection treatment, improving graft and patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.