ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Percutaneous endoscopic treatment for lumbar disorders as day surgery: A-2-Year Follow-Up retrospective cohort study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study summarizes clinical data on daytime percutaneous endoscopic treatment for lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis, comparing outcomes with those of matched hospitalized patients, aiming to analyze its clinical efficacy and identify associated challenges.
methodsRetrieve clinical data from the shared database of orthopedic cases, which contains a total of 5,793 cases. Among them, 2,592 cases involve lumbar spine diseases, with some of these patients having undergone daytime percutaneous endoscopic surgery for LDH or LSS by the same team. Match these with hospitalized patients at a 1:2 ratio. A total of 478 patients were recruited, of which 164 underwent daytime surgery and 314 underwent inpatient surgery. All patients were followed with 2 years; a set of clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed.
resultsCompared to the inpatient surgery group, the day surgery group demonstrated significantly reduced hospitalization duration and costs (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of worsened symptoms after discharge was significantly lower in the PEID-A group compared to the PEID-D group (P < 0.05). Compared to hospitalized surgical patients, there is no significant difference in the recurrence rate among day surgery patients (P > 0.05).
conclusionThe therapeutic effect of percutaneous endoscopic treatment for lumbar spine diseases performed as day surgery is satisfactory. While offering advantages such as lower costs and shorter hospital stays, daytime percutaneous endoscopic surgery requires enhanced preoperative preparation, postoperative medication, patient guidance, and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.