SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Bamboo ecosystem services in 25 years: a systematic literature review of trends, insights, and knowledge gaps.
Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comments on "Bamboo ecosystem services in 25 years: a systematic literature review of trends, insights, and knowledge gaps".Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While bamboo offers various benefits to people, existing reviews on the current state of knowledge and research trends regarding its ecosystem services remain limited. This study aims to systematically review the literature on bamboo ecosystem services, focusing on temporal and geographic patterns, thematic trends, and methodological approaches, as well as the exploration of synergies and trade-offs. It adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and includes an analysis of 56 relevant studies indexed in Scopus. This review shows a recent growing academic interest in bamboo ecosystem services. Research is primarily concentrated in regions where bamboo is commonly found, shaped by regional research capacity, and characterized by both locally led efforts and externally conducted studies. Keyword and co-occurrence analyses identify three main research clusters focused on the quantitative assessment, qualitative investigation and economic valuation of ecosystem services. Methodologically, studies tend to rely on plot sampling for data collection, apply indices for analysis, and present findings through mapping and statistical techniques. Among ecosystem service categories, regulation and maintenance services receive the most attention. However, interactions among services remain underexplored, with research on synergies and trade-offs still limited. These findings provide valuable insights for bamboo forest management and indicate future research directions that merit deeper exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.