Observational studyClinical oral investigations2025
Vitality tests for pulp diagnosis of adjacent teeth following sinus floor elevation: a prospective study.
Observational study in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Schneiderian membrane is elevated to place bone graft material during sinus floor augmentation. Since the teeth's vascular and neurovascular supply passes through the maxillary sinus, this procedure may lead to sensitivity loss in adjacent teeth. This study is the first to prospectively analyze the vitality of adjacent teeth after sinus floor elevation. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were collected between 2015 and 2023 from 158 patients, who underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation and implant placement. A total of 378 teeth were examined for vitality using cold testing at the following time points: (1) before sinus floor elevation, (2) 2 weeks, (3) 4 months, (4) 8 months, and (5) 12 months post-surgery. Follow-up duration ranged from 12 to 32 months.
resultsTwo teeth in two patients showed no vitality before surgery, but became vital postoperatively. In 3 teeth (0.79%), pulp vitality loss was recorded 2 weeks after surgery, which was restored at the 4-month follow-up. These teeth remained vital after one year. The pre-and postoperative pulp vitality comparison showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.625).
conclusionsThis first prospective observational study demonstrated that a few patients experienced temporary pulp sensitivity loss immediately post-surgery, which resolved within four months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pulp sensitivity loss due to vascular disruption during sinus floor augmentation is rare and usually temporary. Despite potential vascular disruption, sinus floor augmentation procedures do not appear to cause permanent pulp sensitivity loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.